Killing your brand to “increase shareholder wealth”

by trey on January 22, 2010

Just ran across John Moore’s manifesto from 2007. He takes up the challenge published by Howard Shultz, the founder of Starbucks. Leading up to 2007, Shultz seriously considered where the company was headed, and didn’t like what he saw. He challenged the company to get back to being a coffee store.

Picture of Trey Pennington at Starbucks in southern Georgia in 2008

Me at Starbucks in southern Georgia in 2008

John Moore became a recognized marketing genius as he went from being a barista to THE marketing guy at Starbucks. When he read the Shultz Challenge, he put together a manifesto: What Must Starbucks Do? In it, he outlines a beautiful case for how the pursuit profit and the approval of Wall Street are diluting the Starbucks brand.

Many people think the goal of business is making money, or, to put it in MBA-speak, “the goal of business is to increase shareholder wealth.” It’s still contrarian for me to keep on saying (but I will), that the goal of business is most definitely NOT money. It is because business leaders have pursued that goal they have killed their companies (okay, not all are dead yet, GM and the big banks and Wall Street have all received billions of life support from Uncle Sam, so they’re not officially dead).

I think John Moore’s manifesto supports my contrarian contention. The very first thing he suggests Starbucks do is redefine success. His manifesto is worth reading and applying even if you don’t have 13,000+ stores.

(note: I sure hope the “big” companies make it and I know their leaders face incredible pressures and challenges that we may never know. I do think this is a wonderful time of opportunity for all companies, and especially smaller companies, to refocus on whatever passion it was that caused them to start the business in the first place. It seems that smaller companies have more freedom to focus on that passion and the customer’s experience of it. At least Wall Street’s not prodding them with a red-hot cattle prod.)

January 23, 2010 Update: This from today’s Financial Times: a review of Crash Course: The American Automobile Industry’s Road from Glory to Disaster.

  • Trey Pennington
    Thank you for reading and sharing. I think you're probably right about the shift. It would be a welcome thing.
  • karimacatherine
    Hello Trey

    Like usual, you keep me thinking and I find this post really good.

    Complimenting with my 2 cents, I think shift is happening with social media where customer is getting slowly but surely at the heart of the company's strategy. 
    With customer come reputation management, brand image, ...
    IMHO, with wise, tech savy, knowledgeable and social customers, brands may need to think beyond money. 

    Karima-Catherine
  • Trackback
    Trackback message
    Title: Social comments and analytics for this post
    Excerpt: This post was mentioned on Twitter by treypennington: How to kill your brand [new post; HT @brandautopsy] http://is.gd/6QC0z
    Blog name: uberVU - social comments
  • Cindy C.
    This seems to be the direction most of the people I read are heading.  Not sure if it's a tsunami yet, or if I just gravitate to this kind of thinking.  Excellent post!  Thanks for sharing his manifesto.  I hope that people not onl READ, but actually HEED...then DO.  Unfortunately, there's a breakdown in that process in many people's response.  Keep changing minds, guys!! 
  • Trey Pennington
    Thanks John.

    Good one-line summary of your piece.

    I'm with you—still too early to tell with Starbucks.
  • john moore
    Trey ... thanks for the RT on Twitter and the shout-out in this post. That manifesto contains lots of smart ideas from a lot of people. It was fun to wrangle 40 or so contributors, as in Starbucks customers, to share their ideas on how Starbucks can get its groove back. The crux of the advice in the manifesto is... Any time any business thanks more about treating customers as eyeballs with wallets and not people with wants they are bound to fail.

    Personally I think it is too early to proclain Starbucks is back as its management is saying. It feels more rheotoric than reality.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: